[1]

Nuzban.

[2]

Surname Gerjung is entered, but Garion is definitely meant.

[3]

#14 One letter of Anna Elisabeth's surname is illegible because there is a straight dividing line.

[4]

In Russian, Johannes Christian Feler is simply written here. German it can be either Völler, Feller or Fehler.

[5]

Falmer is registered. Same problem as surname Feler. German can be either Fallmer or Vollmer.

[6]

Nuzban.

[7]

The surname Stertzer is always entered as Sterzer. In earlier entries I have also entered Sterzer and not Stertzer.

[8]

The date is only on the left, missing in the text.

[9]

There is a note: because of third-degree relationship, the bishop allows the sacrament of matrimony to be administered.

[10]

In the text on the left it says in the branch church, but in which church? So is not registered. Because the young people come from Graf and there is a note in the text about the branch church, I entered Graf. Rohleder is not a branch church and duke? I can't imagine.

[11]

Only "in the branch church" is entered. So it is not registered in which church. I entered Herzog because all surnames come from Herzog.

[12]

Because of the fourth-degree relationship, Bishop Ferdinand Kahn issued permission for the administration of the sacrament under number 35 on February 3, 1860.

[13]

Sieve is entered. But the priest wrote German instead of Russian letters. So sieves. But that's also wrong since "n" is missing. Sieben is correct.

[14]

#19 Because of the relationship of the 4th degree, extra permission from Bishop Ferdinand Kahn on January 26, 1862.

[15]

Due to the 4th degree relationship (3rd degree cousins), extra permission was granted by Bishop Ferdinand Kahn on January 5th, 1863 under number 12.

[16]

Franz Wagner s/o Anton Wagner & Anna Maria Kenner

[17]

If this is Barbara Geier she is widow of a Schuvie

[18]

Parents from Loius. Was in 1850 but not 1857 census. No obvious candidate for 1st husband in Mareintal, perhaps Quint in Loius 57-199

[19]

#17 Because of the 3rd degree relationship (Cosins 2nd degree) extra permission was granted by Bishop Vincent Lipski on January 20th, 1868 under number 35.

[20]

Because of the 4th degree relationship (3rd degree cousins), extra permission was granted by Bishop Vincent Lipski on January 18, 1868 under number 34.

[21]

Because of the 3 degree relationship (Cosins 2 degree), extra permission was granted by Bishop Vincent Lipski on November 8th, 1868 under number 301.

[22]

Because of the 4th degree relationship (3rd degree cousins), extra permission was granted by Bishop Vincent Lipski on January 18, 1869 under number 34.

[23]

Because of the 4 degree relationship (3 degree cousins), extra permission is granted by Bishop Vincent Lipski in February 1870.

[24]

same Katharina appears to marrie Joseph Barbie in Mariental

[25]

was Melchior Dreiling but he's the bride's father

[26]

3 oldest sons of Heinrich already married some more than once so at a minimum should be a widower

[27]

The text does not state where Katharina Schiller comes from. But next to the names of her parents is: The colonists from Mariental. I would say that maiden is from Mariental.

[28]

the wedding venue is not listed here either. It just says: in the branch church. Because Johannes Peter Kuhn comes from Herzog, I can imagine that the branch church in Herzog is meant.

[29]

The wedding location is not listed. Here it only says: in the parish church. So Rohleder, because the branch churches were in Graf and Herzog at that time

[30]

again only says "in the parish church". So Rohleder.

[31]

Witness Johannes last name is definitely written in dialect. Looks like Bauman. I'm not entirely sure, that's why the ? sign.

[32]

The parents of widow Elisabeth Rupp say: from Obermonjou.

[33]

Because of the 4th degree relationship (3rd degree cousins), permission should actually be given by the bishop. Either the priest did not check carefully or the relatives of the 4th degree were now allowed to marry without extra permission.

[34]

Again "in the branch church". I think Graf is correct.

[35]

February 4 is entered in the text and February 6 in the column on the left. I think 04.02. it's right

[36]

Only "in the parish church" is entered here. parish church is meant Rohleder In #30 we see "in the Rohleder parish church"

[37]

again only says "in the parish church". So Rohleder.

[38]

February 4 is entered in the text and February 24 in the column on the left. In the entries before and after it says 24 February, i.e. 24.02. it's right.

[39]

"In the branch church" again. Johannes Schönberger comes from Herzog. So in this 1875 year the weddings took place in these branch churches, where the young man came from. I would say: Herzog is correct.

[40]

It just says "in the branch church". I think Herzog is correct.

[41]

January is not listed. But it is logical that it means January.

[42]

Indez # was written as 19

[43]

The priest almost always writes "both colonists from …." this year, even where only the bridegroom is actually meant.

[44]

February is not entered. But it is also clear enough that February is meant.

[45]

again priest writes "both Graf - colonists".